Zorn v. Linton · ¶2

Held: Because the Second Circuit failed to identify a case where an officer using a routine wristlock on a protester after issuing a verbal warning, without more, was held to have violated the Constitution, Zorn was entitled to qualified immunity. Government officials enjoy qualified immunity from suit under § 1983 unless their conduct violates clearly established law. Rivas-Villegas v. Cortesluna, 595 U. S. 1, 5 (per cu riam). To find that a right is clearly established, courts generally “need to identify a case where an officer acting under similar circumstances . . . was held to have violated” the Constitution. Escondido v. Emmons, 586 U. S. 38, 43 (per curiam) (internal quotation marks omitted). The relevant precedent must define the right with a “high degree of specifcity,” so that “every reasonable official would interpret it to establish the particular rule the plaintiff seeks to…

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.