gloss · the reading room

Trump v. Slaughter · ¶162

Far from the minimal impact that the majority imagines Humphrey's to have had, ante, at 447–450, Humphrey's has sat at the center of this Court's separation-of-powers jurisprudence for nearly a century. If precedent were any guide, this case would be open and shut: The FTC's removal protections, as the Court has long held and repeatedly recognized, are constitutional.
Read in context ›

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.