Trump v. Slaughter · ¶242

In the end, this Court has not “been forced to clarify the doctrine” in this arena “again and again.” Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, 603 U. S. 369, 409 (2024). Nor has Humphrey's spurred major “confusion and disagreement” in the lower courts, or “generated a long list of Circuit conficts.” Dobbs, 597 U. S., at 283–284. Instead, the Hum phrey's rule is long established and has been easily applied for decades.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.