Trump v. Slaughter · ¶245
In the end, this Court has not “been forced to clarify the doctrine” in this arena “again and again.” Loper Bright En terprises v. Raimondo, 603 U. S. 369, 409 (2024). Nor has Humphrey’s spurred major “confusion and disagreement” in the lower courts, or “generated a long list of Circuit conflicts.” Dobbs, 597 U. S., at 283–284. Instead, the Humph rey’s rule is long established and has been easily applied for decades.Read in context ›
slip opinion, revised 7/07/26
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.