Trump v. Slaughter · ¶49
“[T]he injury and invalidity” of the law was “immediately recognized by the Executive and objected to”—and not just by Johnson. Id., at 167. “General Grant, succeeding Mr. Johnson in the Presidency”—and no fan of Johnson or his program—“earnestly recommended in his first message the total repeal” of the law. Id., at 167–168. “What faith can an Executive put in officials forced upon him?” Grant asked. Id., at 168. “How will such officials be likely to serve an Administration which they know does not trust them?” Ibid. Despite Grant’s efforts, “[t]he feeling growing out of the controversy with President Johnson retained the act on the statute book”—and led to one other such law, the one for postmasters at issue in that very case—“until 1887,” when the Tenure in Office Act was repealed. Ibid.Read in context ›
slip opinion, revised 7/07/26
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.