Trump v. Slaughter · ¶77

Nor do we determine the fate of officials not before us. In particular, as the Solicitor General recognized at argument, the permissibility of tenure protections for the judges of “non-Article III courts,” such as the Tax Court and the Court of Federal Claims, is not “presented” or “briefed” in this case and poses a “different set of questions.” Tr. of Oral Arg. 15, 28. We leave those questions for another day. All we do today is recognize what has been clear for a century—that those who fall within the President's “general administrative control” must be removable by the President at will. Myers, 272 U. S., at 135.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.