Trump v. Slaughter · ¶81

Nor do we determine the fate of officials not before us. In particular, as the Solicitor General recognized at argument, the permissibility of tenure protections for the judges of “non-Article III courts,” such as the Tax Court and the Court of Federal Claims, is not “presented” or “briefed” in this case and poses a “different set of questions.” Tr. of Oral Arg. 15, 28. We leave those questions for another day. All we do today is recognize what has been clear for a century— that those who fall within the President’s “general administrative control” must be removable by the President at will. Myers, 272 U. S., at 135.

slip opinion, revised 7/07/26
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.