Trump v. Slaughter · ¶91

Indeed, the dissent’s ode to stare decisis is hard to reconcile with its reinvention of Humphrey’s and shabby treatment of Myers. At least we have accorded Humphrey’s a respectful burial; the dissent would cast Myers aside without a second thought. See post, at 29–30 (denigrating My ers). It is entitled to propose as much, of course, but it can hardly claim the mantle of stare decisis in doing so.

slip opinion, revised 7/07/26
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.