gloss · the reading room

Trump v. Barbara · ¶329

The Court likewise cannot explain the evidence that citizenship in this country was instead based on domicile. See Part I–A–1, supra. It does not meaningfully engage with the congressional debates, during which this provision was extensively discussed. See Part I–D, supra. And, it has no account of why so many legislators made so many statements irreconcilable with its view. See ibid.
Read in context ›

slip opinion, revised 7/01/26
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.