Trump v. Barbara · ¶346
Likewise, in 1884, this Court interpreted the Citizenship Clause to require that a person be “not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to [its] political jurisdiction,” “owing [it] direct and immediate allegiance,” and “owing no allegiance to any alien power.” Elk, 112 U. S., at 101–102; accord, id., at 117–122 (Harlan, J., dissenting); Plessy, 163 U. S., at 563 (Harlan, J., dissenting). The Court also rejects that position today. See ante, at 25.Read in context ›
slip opinion, revised 7/01/26
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.