FCC v. AT&T · ¶49

Regardless, the carriers are not impermissibly coerced into forgoing their right to a jury. They argue that insisting upon their jury right and awaiting an enforcement suit poses two distinct harms: first, that the Commission will use the existence of the order and the fact of nonpayment against them. Brief for the Carriers 46–48; see id., at 49–50. And second, that the order will cause reputational harm while the carriers await an enforcement suit. Id., at 45–46.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.