Blanche v. Lau · ¶28

Under these rules, Lau was correctly charged with inadmissibility. At step one, the Government properly regarded him as an alien seeking admission because he had committed a crime involving moral turpitude before attempting to reenter the country. See Luz Munoz, 755 F. 3d, at 370. So, at step two, he was inadmissible and therefore removable if he satisfied any statutory ground for inadmissibility, including that he had been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude. See §1229a(e)(2)(A).

slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.