Blanche v. Lau · ¶30

The Second Circuit resisted that straightforward analysis. In its view, at step one, the Government had the burden “to prove by clear and convincing evidence that [Lau] actually committed the crime in question at the time of reentry.” 130 F. 4th, at 47 (emphasis added). We disagree.

slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.