Sripetch v. SEC · ¶17

The district court accepted the Commission's second argument. As it saw things, the SEC had done enough to show that Mr. Sripetch's investors had suffered pecuniary loss. Pet. App. 30a. Accordingly, the district court did not decide whether such a showing was required in the first place. Ibid.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.