Mullin v. Al Otro Lado · ¶115
Respondents' interpretation is further supported by the “ `cardinal principle of statutory construction' that `a statute ought . . . to be so construed that, if it can be prevented, no clause, sentence, or word shall be superfuous, void, or insignifcant.' ” TRW Inc. v. Andrews, 534 U. S. 19, 31 (2001).Read in context ›
preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.