Mullin v. Al Otro Lado · ¶187
But the Court is not a law student puzzling through a difficult cold call. When we issue opinions, we create legal rules with real-world impact. It is for this very reason that our precedents require “a concrete factual context conducive to a realistic appreciation of the consequences of judicial action.” Valley Forge, 454 U. S., at 472. Because we so obviously lack that context here, we should not have decided this case.Read in context ›
slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.