Klein v. Martin · ¶21
Martin then sought postconviction relief in state court. He argued that the State had violated his right to due process by failing to disclose a forensic report that had analyzed five computers found at his home. One of these machines, a laptop, had been issued to Martin by a former employer. The report found no evidence that this laptop had been used since 2005, and it noted that a keyword search for words such as “ `Handgun,' ” “ `Gatorade,' ” “ `silencer,' ” and “ `Homemade silencer' ” had yielded no hits. App. 103a–104a.Read in context ›
preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.