Whitton v. Dixon · ¶17
The evidence at trial also included the blood spatter that the police discovered. The blood found in Whitton's boots matched Maulden's blood type but not Whitton's. Whitton's car also contained blood that matched Maulden's blood type. But, Whitton called a DNA analyst who said that the blood on the boots did not match Maulden's DNA.Read in context ›
preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.