Whitton v. Dixon · ¶21

In 2002, the State retested the blood on Whitton's boots and confirmed that it belonged to Maulden. Contrary to Whitton's DNA analyst's testimony at trial, the blood in the right boot matched the “ `DNA profle of James Maulden.' ” App. to Pet. for Cert. 6a, n. 5. The testing also identified Maulden as a DNA contributor to blood found on the left boot.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.