McCarthy v. Hernandez · ¶25

Hernandez fled an application for a writ of habeas corpus in Federal District Court. He argued that the Appellate Division had violated clearly established federal law in rejecting his Miranda arguments and in its ruling on the trial court's response to the jury note. That response, Hernandez maintained, itself violated clearly established federal law by failing to explain to the jury the rule that Justice Kennedy adopted in his opinion concurring in the judgment in Mis souri v. Seibert, 542 U. S. 600.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.