Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties · ¶18
Jules fled a timely petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of the Second Circuit's conclusion that Badgerow's holding is limited to freestanding § 9 and § 10 applications without a pre-existing federal lawsuit. Two other Courts of Appeals have agreed with the Second Circuit after Bad gerow, but the Fourth Circuit has held that Badgerow's holding applies to all § 9 and § 10 motions, regardless of whether claims were fled in federal court before they were resolved in arbitration. Compare George v. Rushmore Serv. Center, LLC, 114 F. 4th 226, 238, n. 16 (CA3 2024), and Kinsella v. Baker Hughes Oilfelds Operations, LLC, 66 F. 4th 1099, 1103 (CA7 2023), with SmartSky Networks, LLC v. DAG Wireless, LTD., 93 F. 4th 175, 183 (CA4 2024). This Court granted certiorari to resolve the division among the Courts of Appeals. 607 U. S. 1079 (2025).Read in context ›
preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.