Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties · ¶20

This case asks whether a federal court with pre-existing jurisdiction over claims that it stayed pending arbitration under § 3 can adjudicate a § 9 or § 10 motion even if that motion does not present, on its face, an independent basis for federal jurisdiction. The answer is yes. “[A] court with the power to stay the action under § 3 has the further power to confirm [or vacate] any ensuing arbitration award.” Cor tez Byrd, 529 U. S., at 202 (addressing a different, venue- related question under the FAA).

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.