Pung v. Isabella County · ¶17

“1. Whether taking and selling a home to satisfy a debt to the government, and keeping the surplus value as a windfall, violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment when the compensation is based on the artifcially depressed auction sale price rather than the property's fair market value? “2. Whether the forfeiture of real property worth far more than needed to satisfy a tax debt but sold for [a] fraction of its real value constitutes an excessive fine under the Eighth Amendment, particularly when the debt was never actually owed?” Pet. for Cert. i.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.