Allen v. Milligan · ¶9

After Callais, we vacated District Court injunctions that prevented the State of Alabama from using a congressional map that it enacted in 2023. See Allen v. Caster, 608 U. S. ––– (2026). The District Court had held that the State's map violated § 2 because it had only one district in which black voters were a majority and did not include an additional “[b]lack-opportunity” district. Singleton v. Allen, 782 F. Supp. 3d 1092, 1114, 1309 (ND Ala. 2025) (per curiam). The District Court also concluded that the 2023 map violated the Fourteenth Amendment because it constituted a deliberate “refus[al] to satisfy the remedial requirements” it previously imposed and an attempt to avoid a future judgment requiring the same remedy. Id., at 1355.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.