Trump v. Cook · ¶131
The Court rightly does not accept Cook's claim that the President lacked “cause” to remove her. The Court opines that “cause” means a “ `substantial, reasonable and just' ” reason, or a “ `disqualifcation' akin to `ineffciency' or `incompetency.' ” Ante, at 546. Given the presumption of regularity, the accusation of mortgage fraud—a financial crime punishable by up to 30 years in prison—satisfes that standard. The Court does not hold otherwise.Read in context ›
preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.