Trump v. Cook · ¶148
The Court’s interpretation is also inconsistent with “congressional practice.” Id., at 243 (opinion of ROBERTS, C. J.). Congress has enacted dozens of statutes that require notice and a hearing before an officer can be removed. They all do so “in explicit terms.” Ibid. These statutes, for instance, provide that an officer “may be removed by the President only upon notice and hearing,” 5 U. S. C. §7104(b) (emphasis added), or that “[a]ny such . . . removal may be made only after notice and opportunity for a hearing,” 17 U. S. C. §802(i) (emphasis added). A month before the for-cause removal protection was restored to the Federal Reserve Act, —————— and opportunity for a hearing, that such member” met certain criteria); 16 U. S. C. §1852(b)(6)(B) (“The Secretary may remove for cause any member . . . found by the Secretary, after notice and an opportunity for a hearing . . . to have…Read in context ›
slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.