Trump v. Cook · ¶149
It is thus difficult to rationalize the Court’s interpretation of the Federal Reserve Act in terms of ordinary meaning, the common law, or any statutory precedents. The more obvious rationale for the Court’s interpretation today is not any principle of law, but instead the Court’s view of “the Federal Reserve’s unique historical status and role.” Ante, at 13.Read in context ›
slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.