Trump v. Cook · ¶168
Finally, the balance of harms and equities also favors the President. “[T]he Government faces greater risk of harm from an order allowing a removed officer to continue exercising the executive power than a wrongfully removed officer faces from being unable to perform her statutory duty.” Trump v. Wilcox, 605 U. S. 922, 923 (2025). The equities in this case are relevantly similar to the equities in every removal case in which the Court has granted a stay. See ibid.; Trump v. Boyle, 606 U. S. 989, 989–990 (2025); Trump v. Slaughter, 606 U. S. 1051 (2025). The Government also suffers irreparable harm from all “injunctions that likely exceed the authority” of the federal courts. CASA, 606 U. S., at 860.Read in context ›
preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.