Trump v. Cook · ¶188

Because the courts below resolved these two issues incorrectly, I would conclude that the President has shown a likelihood that we would reverse at this preliminary stage, leaving all other issues to be developed on remand in the first instance. As to the remaining stay factors, this Court has held that they are satisfied when a lower court countermands the President’s removal of a principal executive officer. See Trump v. Wilcox, 605 U. S. ＿＿＿, ＿＿＿ (2025) (slip op., at 1–2). A stay is therefore warranted here.

slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.