Trump v. Cook · ¶196

To get around this problem, the Court adopts an implausibly narrow reading of the injunction: It interprets the injunction “to forbid the implementation of `the President's letter of August 25' in which he purported to fre Cook—but not to forbid the President from trying again, if he chooses to do so.” Ante, at 558, n. 8. In other words, the injunction stops the President from “fring her by that letter,” not “fring her for mortgage fraud.” But that is simply not what the injunction says. It forbids Cook's removal based on “the grounds” stated in the President's August 25th letter— i. e., mortgage fraud. And the D. C. Circuit's order denying the stay left that broad injunction in place—as does the Court's.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.