Trump v. Cook · ¶37

Even if the President's determination is judicially reviewable, the Government (and Justice Thomas) contend, “cause” sets a very low bar—one that the President easily cleared. In the Government's view, “cause” includes any concern the President may have about a person's “conduct, ability, ftness, or competence.” Application 25–26 (quoting Black's Law Dictionary 508 (2d ed. 1910)); see also post, at 578 (Thomas, J., dissenting). That excludes a “mere policy disagreement,” according to the Government, but it includes (among many other things) “concerns” about a person's “integrity”—precisely the cause given here. Application 26, 31.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.