Trump v. Cook · ¶85
When it comes to the President’s ability to fire members of the Federal Reserve, the public’s interest in the continued viability of our Nation’s economy is at stake. The thought that the President suffers a comparable level of harm simply because he is temporarily unable to remove Cook from office is “facially absurd.” Department of Home land Security v. D. V. D., 606 U. S. ＿＿＿, ＿＿＿ (2025) (SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting from grant of application for stay) (slip op., at 11).Read in context ›
slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.