Trump v. Cook · ¶86

When it comes to the President's ability to fre members of the Federal Reserve, the public's interest in the continued viability of our Nation's economy is at stake. The thought that the President suffers a comparable level of harm simply because he is temporarily unable to remove Cook from office is “facially absurd.” Department of Homeland Security v. D. V. D., 606 U. S. 901, 909 (2025) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting from grant of application for stay).

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.