Mirabelli v. Bonta · ¶9

The Ninth Circuit granted defendants' motion to stay the injunction pending appeal. It began by raising procedural objections to the District Court's injunction. It claimed that the District Court had granted class certification without undertaking the “ `rigorous analysis' ” required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. App. 7a (quoting Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 564 U. S. 338, 351 (2011)). And it stated that the injunction appeared to be overly broad because it “covers every parent of California's millions of public school students and every public school employee in the state.” App. 6a. As a result, it opined, the injunction seemed to grant relief to uninjured class members who lacked Article III standing.

preliminary print (page proof)
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.