gloss · the reading room

Trump v. California · ¶34

Today’s decision does not address whether the President’s attempts to interfere with States’ administration of the November 2026 elections are lawful. Nor does it suggest that the Executive Branch has any constitutional or statutory authority to implement the President’s directives. Instead, today’s decision merely postpones adjudication of those challenges. Nonetheless, because I believe the respondent States’ challenges are justiciable now, I respectfully dissent.
Read in context ›

slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.