Trump v. California · ¶67
Even assuming arguendo that the Executive suffers some harm due to the District Court’s injunction, the balance of the equities and the public’s interest strongly favor maintaining this injunction. Properly evaluating these stay factors requires comparing the real-world impact of granting a stay versus the practical consequences of denying one. See Barnes v. E-Systems, Inc. Group Hospital Medical & Surgical Ins. Plan, 501 U. S. 1301, 1305 (1991) (Scalia, J., in chambers). That comparison yields a strikingly straightforward answer here.Read in context ›
slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.