gloss · the reading room

Trump v. California · ¶77

First and foremost, the undisputed record evidence shows that the Order is injuring state and local officials right now, as the lower courts found. See ___ F. 4th, at ___–___, App. 7a–8a; ___ F. Supp. 3d, at ___–___, App. 41a–42a. The facts establish that the Order has already placed “an incredible strain” on state election officials who, due to their obligations to plan and prepare for elections well in advance, must devote time and resources today to “coordinate the implementation of the changes articulated in the [Order],” on “compressed timelines” and with “limited resources.” See ___ F. 4th, at ___, App. 8a. And the Government does not, and cannot, contest this. The majority reaches the opposite conclusion by simply ignoring the District Court’s findings of fact and the record developed below. See n. 7, supra.
Read in context ›

slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.