Department of Homeland Security v. League of Women Voters · ¶34

So, Respondents filed an amended complaint, further alleging that the modifications to SAVE violated the Social Security Act’s confidentiality provision at 42 U. S. C. §405(c)(2)(C)(viii)(I). First Amended Complaint in No. 1:25–cv–3501, ECF Doc. 61, ¶204. And they bolstered their Privacy Act claims, arguing that SSA’s disclosures of NUMIDENT information did not count as a “routine use” under the Act, and regardless, DHS and SSA had unlawfully failed to timely publish a SORN, or provide a public comment period, before sharing that information. Id., at ¶¶218–235. Respondents also claimed that outdated SSA data put some of their recently naturalized members at risk of either being deregistered to vote or having to verify their citizenship before being allowed to cast ballots in the 2026 primary or general elections. Id., at ¶¶168–170.

slip opinion
Source edition
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.