gloss · the reading room

Gideon v. Wainwright · ¶27

“Obviously Fourteenth Amendment cases dealing with state action have no application here, but if they did, we believe that to deprive civilian dependents of the safeguards of a jury trial here... would be as invalid under those cases as it would be in cases of a capital nature.” 361 U. S., at 246-247.
Read in context ›

U. S. Reports, bound volume
U. S. Reports, volume 372, at 335 (Library of Congress) · transcription: Caselaw Access Project
Passage preview. Read in context for the complete text, notes and references.