gloss · the reading room

Brandenburg v. Ohio

395 U.S. 444 · 1969-06-09

Advocacy may be punished only when directed to inciting imminent lawless action and likely to produce it.

Edition: U. S. Reports, bound volume
Source: U. S. Reports, volume 395, at 444 (Library of Congress) · transcription: Caselaw Access Project
Voices: Per Curiam. · Mr. Justice Black, concurring. · Mr. Justice Douglas, concurring.
The appellant, a leader of a Ku Klux Klan group, was convicted under the Ohio Criminal Syndicalism statute for “advocating]... the duty, necessity, or propriety of crime, sabotage, violence, or unlawful methods of terrorism as a means of accomplishing industrial or political reform” and for “voluntarily assembl[ing] with any society, group, or assemblage of persons formed to teach or advocate the doctrines of criminal syndicalism.” Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2923.13. He was fined $1,000 and sentenced to one to 10 years’ imprisonment. The appellant challenged the constitutionality of the criminal…
The record shows that a man, identified at trial as the appellant, telephoned an announcer-reporter on the staff of a Cincinnati television station and invited him to come to a Ku Klux Klan “rally” to be held at a farm in Hamilton County. With the cooperation of the organizers, the reporter and a cameraman attended the meeting and filmed the events. Portions of the films were later broadcast on the local station and on a national network.
Read it in the reading room ›